Quantum Readiness
Adamas Governance Institute
A division of Adamas Capital Inc.
1. Quantum Acceleration: Governance Implications
Quantum systems are no longer progressing along linear research curves.
Recent developments indicate the early onset of threshold-class capability, where scale increases disproportionately alter system behavior, computational exposure, and cryptographic viability.
Institutions now face three concurrent realities:
- Advances will outpace regulatory adaptation.
Quantum progress is accelerating faster than oversight mechanisms. - Vulnerabilities will emerge before replacements are fully deployed.
PQC migration, key-rotation, and system hardening remain incomplete globally. - Operational, ethical, and systemic consequences will compound.
Quantum-class capability affects not only cryptography, but coordination, prediction, markets, and emotional-dyadic systems interacting with AI.
These shifts make transition governance, not technology adoption, the defining priority.
This is the domain addressed by the Quantum Transition Governance Framework (Q-TGF).
Its purpose is not to evaluate quantum performance.
Its purpose is to stabilize institutions during the transition.
2. Quantum Signal Index (QSI)
A permanent, updateable indicator maintained by Adamas Governance Institute.
The QSI enables institutions to understand the governance posture required based on the latest verified developments in quantum capability.
QSI Level Definitions
- Level 1 — Research Phase
Prototype-class advances with limited systemic implication. - Level 2 — Acceleration Phase
Scaling inflection points indicating future governance impact. - Level 3 — Transition Phase
Capability trajectories affecting cryptographic and operational integrity. - Level 4 — Exposure Phase
Clear and measurable institutional vulnerability pathways. - Level 5 — Systemic Threshold Phase
Quantum-class computation capable of destabilizing existing security or coordination systems.
Current QSI Status
QSI Level 3 — Transition Phase
Last Update: December 2025
Signal Event: 10,000-qubit photonic processor deployment (QuantWare)
Governance Interpretation:
Not a cryptographic break, but a time-horizon compression event.
Institutions must assume PQC and transition controls require earlier execution than planned.
Implication:
Q-TGF transition governance—rather than PQC alone—is now required for readiness.
3. Institutional Readiness Requirements
Quantum acceleration does not require panic; it requires structured governance posture.
Adamas Governance Institute advises institutions to adopt the following stance:
A. Assessment
- Map cryptographic exposure.
- Identify interdependencies across legacy systems.
- Evaluate operational processes sensitive to computational disruption.
B. Transition Governance
- Implement Q-TGF's multi-stage decision architecture.
- Establish board-level responsibility for quantum transition.
- Align leadership, compliance, and operational teams around a single governance protocol.
C. Coordination
- Synchronize with internal cybersecurity, AI teams, and external partners.
- Establish cross-institution communication channels for transition integrity.
D. Stabilization
- Deploy emotional-governance systems to buffer human-AI interaction stress during transition.
- Reinforce communication pathways to avoid misinformation or operational drift.
Quantum readiness is not solely a technical challenge.
It is a governance challenge affecting every decision layer of an institution.
4. Why Q-TGF Is Required Now
Most transition frameworks presume predictable technological timelines.
Quantum acceleration invalidates those assumptions.
Q-TGF enables institutions to operate under:
- Uncertainty
- Asymmetric information
- Nonlinear technological progression
- Sociotechnical interdependence
- National-scale systemic exposure
It ensures that decision-making, communication pathways, and institutional posture remain coherent as quantum capability advances.
Q-TGF does not compete with PQC.
Q-TGF governs the transition PQC will operate within.
This distinction is essential.
5. Q-TGF Access
Institutions seeking transition-readiness evaluation or access to the full Q-TGF doctrine must submit a request through the Q-TGF Access Portal.
Adamas Governance Institute reviews all submissions for institutional alignment, governance integrity, and ethical suitability.
Proceed to the Q-TGF Access Page
Requests undergo screening to ensure alignment with sovereign, institutional, and ethical standards.